1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from November 4, 2016 to July 4, 2017.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 8, the plaintiff became aware of the defendant at a club around June 2012 and became to teach the defendant. The defendant was married with his wife and child, but the plaintiff was hiding such facts, but the plaintiff thought that he was unmarried and married. The plaintiff had sexual intercourse several times in the process, and the plaintiff was pregnant on several occasions on November 2015. The plaintiff was pregnant, and was subject to a abortion surgery according to the defendant's end-of-life, and the defendant introduced the plaintiff to his workplace rent as a woman-friendly woman-friendly Gu around February 2016. The plaintiff discovered that the defendant's mobile phone number was stored in the defendant's mobile phone number, namely, the defendant's telephone number was stored in the defendant's mobile phone number, and the fact that the defendant was married to his spouse on September 1, 2016 can only be acknowledged.

Even if both parties entered into a sex relationship by mutual agreement, if the other party's act was in violation of public order and good morals, even if the other party is not liable for criminal liability, the other party's act constitutes a tort. It is reasonable to deem that the other party's act constitutes a violation of the other party's right to sexual self-determination. In this case, in light of the empirical rule, the defendant's series of acts that the defendant concealed the remaining-born facts against public order and good morals, and entered into a sex relationship with the other party on the premise of marriage constitutes an act contrary to public order and good morals. Accordingly, it is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered mental suffering, and thus, the defendant is

Furthermore, with respect to the amount of consolation money, this case includes the period of restriction and age of the plaintiff and the defendant at the time of restriction, the behavior of the defendant deceiving the plaintiff, the frequency of sexual relationship, and the attitude of the defendant.