logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.07.16 2012고정335
보조금의예산및관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

I, C, D, E, F, G, and H shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

The above defendants did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The National Fisheries Partnership established for the purpose of improving fishery productivity, increasing the members' income, environmental movement, etc. through the rationalization of fishery management. The total members of the National Fisheries Partnership established for the purpose of improving fishery productivity, increasing the members' income, etc. The above defendant A served as the representative of the above corporation from January 2007, and the above defendant B served as the representative of the above corporation from January 2007, and the above defendant B served as the general affairs of the above corporation from January 207, and the remaining defendants are members of the above corporation.

Defendant

I, C, D, E, F, G, and H have selected a business operator as a result of submitting a business plan (total project cost of KRW 104,00,000, business operator 13, subsidy of KRW 82,92,00 per capita, KRW 6,384,00 per capita, KRW 21,008,00 per capita: 1,616,000 per capita, but have failed to bear the self-responsibility but have failed to obtain subsidies by means of submitting a false tax invoice as if they did not bear the self-responsibility.

Defendant

P, which is separated from I, at a place where the location is unknown on March 2, 2009, “A” means that Q is to install an O door more larger than the O standard on the plan and additionally cover the expenses at its own expense and to request a settlement report by issuing a tax invoice, and Defendant C, separately confirmed R, Defendant F, and G are not capable of paying the expenses, and the tax invoice is issued and a settlement report is submitted by issuing the tax invoice to Q.” Defendant D, E, H, and separately determined P did not have the ability to pay the expenses, and Defendant D, E, H, and separately determined P intended to obtain subsidies by fraud or other unlawful means by obtaining the tax invoice.

arrow