1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 2,445,100 for the Plaintiff and KRW 15% per annum from April 20, 2019 to May 31, 2019; and (b) thereafter,

1. There is no dispute between the parties to a judgment as to the cause of the claim, or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement in subparagraph 2-39 of the evidence No. 2, the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that the goods equivalent to KRW 2,445,100 have been supplied to the Defendant from January 5, 2017 to April 13, 2017.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 2,445,100 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from April 20, 2019 to May 31, 2019, under the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings, which is the day after the delivery date of the complaint of this case sought by the plaintiff, and 12% per annum from the next day to the day after full payment is made.

2. The defendant's assertion is alleged to the purport that the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim, as he/she is aware that the goods supplied by the plaintiff were supplied in the course of operation by the N president after receiving O members from the N president on January 3, 2017, and closed the business on August 27, 2018. However, the plaintiff's delivery of goods to the defendant from January 5, 2017 to April 13, 2017 is as seen above, and even according to the defendant's argument, this constitutes the period during which the defendant operated the O members, and thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.