logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.10 2015가합543394
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s claim for damages arising from obstruction of construction by May 26, 2015, among the lawsuits against Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G.

Reasons

The facts based on the following facts are either not disputed between the parties, or acknowledged based on Gap evidence Nos. 1-10, 13, 15, 31, 64, 65, 72, 76, 121, 122, and Gap evidence Nos. 155-2, Gap evidence Nos. 156, Eul evidence Nos. 3, 7, and 8 (including the branch numbers that do not specify the numbers among those with the branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply).

The Plaintiff, a company developing and manufacturing concrete mixtures, purchased I forest land (hereinafter “instant construction site”) around September 22, 2009, and newly built a research institute on the ground (hereinafter “instant research institute”) around September 15, 2014 (hereinafter “instant research institute”), obtained construction permission on October 27, 2014 from the J market.

The construction site of this case is located far from K Elementary School, L Apartment (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) and about 100 meters, and the defendants are residents of the apartment of this case who oppose the construction of the research institute of this case.

As the Plaintiff started the new construction of the instant research institute (hereinafter “instant construction”), the residents of the instant apartment including Defendant H et al. against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the Plaintiff uses toxic chemicals and cryr chemical substances, and flows into neighboring sites or water supply and drainage systems, and the wastewater generated in the process of developing concrete mixtures may flow out into neighboring sites or water supply and drainage systems,”” (U.S. District Court 2015Kahap10037) was dismissed on May 14, 2015.

The J Mayor submitted explanatory materials to the Plaintiff on June 15, 2015 regarding the fact that the Plaintiff submitted false documents at the time of the determination of the urban planning facilities and the authorization of the implementation plan, and the construction shall be suspended until the date of conclusion on the above contents.

arrow