logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고정2118
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From February 2015, to April 17, 2015, the Defendant provided eight PCs to “CPCs” located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, and provided eight PCs for unspecified customers to use game money directly with members ID created without one’s own certification by using a separate manager page different from the classification of rating, and the content of the changed “flass game” (which consists of flass, flass, ampers, and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass and flass.).

As a result, the defendant provided game products different from the classification of classification to customers for use.

2. From May 2015 to June 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) controlled the police while operating an illegal PC using “cPC game” in the above “CPC game; (b) provided 8 PC again with two PCs by installing two PCs; (c) unlike the classification classified as the following, customers can be charged with the PCs by using a separate manager page; (d) the remaining game money can be collected by themselves; and (e) the number of customers can be collected by winning or wearing the PCs; and (e) the number of unspecified customers can be provided with the 337 “(D) games, the structure of which is different from the classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of classification of “370 PCs, 3370, 3377 and 337.7.

As a result, the defendant provided game products different from the classification of classification to customers for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. F's certificate;

1. Provision of enforcement support results, replys and requests for the results of appraisal;

1.Each.

arrow