1. The Defendant’s limited liability law firm C, 201, July 20, 2017, Promissory Notes No. 747 against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 20, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) drafted a notarial deed No. 747 of 2017, stating that the Plaintiff did not raise any objection even if a notary public delays the payment of the instant promissory note from an attorney-at-law in charge of authentication in the limited liability law firm (LLC), and issued a notarial deed of 747 of 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “notarial deed of this case”) to the Defendant, which was as of September 29, 2017, with the date of payment KRW 150,000,000,000 for the Plaintiff; and (b) issued it to the Defendant on September 29, 2017.

B. The Defendant lent KRW 130 million to the Plaintiff on the same day.

C. From September 29, 2017 to December 21, 2017, the Plaintiff fully repaid the principal and interest on the loan of KRW 1.3 million as follows.

1) The payment of KRW 70,00,000 on September 29, 2017, the remainder of KRW 60,000,000 on the condition that the due date will be postponed on October 31, 2017) and the remainder of KRW 35,00,000 on the leased principal for which the due date has not been observed and interest payment period shall be extended by one month, instead of extending the due date for 1 month, the payment of KRW 2,70,000 on the interest rate of KRW 37,70,700,000 on the outstanding principal and interest rate of KRW 205,00 on the outstanding interest rate of KRW 37,70,000 on the outstanding interest rate of KRW 205,00 on the outstanding interest rate of KRW 37,700,000 on the outstanding interest rate of KRW 200 on November 37, 2017, each of which shall be paid by the Plaintiff, including the remaining KRW 1000,301,00000.8.1.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Parties’ assertion 1.