The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (3 million won in penalty) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable, such as the fact that the defendant makes a confession and reflects on the facts of the crime, the fact that there is no criminal record of the same kind, and the fact that he has subscribed to the automobile insurance.

On the other hand, the Defendant’s negligence while driving the instantless driver’s license while driving the instantless driver’s license, which led to two victims of the traffic accident (in need of three weeks and two weeks) caused by the traffic accident involving the damaged vehicle parked in the front signal atmosphere, and thus, it is disadvantageous that the Defendant did not agree with the victims until the death of the vessel.

In addition, considering the overall circumstances, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is deemed to have been determined by taking into account various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances before and after committing a crime, the lower court’s punishment is not deemed to be unfair because it is too unreasonable for the lower court to have imposed punishment.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.