A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

D is the representative director of E, a corporation established for the purpose of usfk-related business, etc., and F is a person working as a Korean person in charge at the usfk G G G base management office, and the defendant is a person working as pipeline air at the usfk H base between D and Gu, and I is a person working as an employee of E.

Around July 2013, the Defendant, D, F, and I conspired to supply gas to the responsible Korean officer F by taking advantage of the fact that the inspection, etc. of the goods ordered through the usfk G G base management unit is actually entrusted to the Korean officer F. In fact, the Defendant and D, F, and I intended to acquire the price by acquiring the price by acquiring the price by supplying the gas mons with low quality and less quantity than the actual gas monet ordered.

Accordingly, around July 12, 2013, D and the Defendant entered into a supply contract of KRW 9,360,000,000 for 1,200 in weight with the United States Armed Forces Contracts (USF) around July 12, 2013 under the name of K registered in the name of the Defendant’s Dong-J. On October 16, 2013, I continued to import and customs clearance of about KRW 21 km from China to about 700, weighted from China. On October 18, 2013, I transported 70,00 of the above Pakistan to the G base of the USF headquarters. Around that time, F sold L, a warehouse leader, and submitted a receipt of KRW 1,200,00 to the usfk Agreement.

The Defendant, D, F, and I deceiving the usfk contract status as such, and they were transferred to the national bank account under J as the price for supply on December 9, 2013 from the usfk contract status.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning examination of suspects of L by each prosecution;

1. Each part of the prosecution against the defendant, F, I, or D, and a protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the police;

1. A protocol concerning examination of partially the police in relation to the J;

1. Each police report on M, N,O, P, and Q;

1. AR statement;

1. Investigation reports (related to the destruction of evidence, appending to the analysis of seized materials, requests related to the quality of omitted supplied E, or omissions;