1. The deposit money for KRW 13,298,550 deposited by the Suwon District Court No. 2018Hun-Ba14322 on December 17, 2018.

1. Claim against Defendant C, E, F, and G

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Grounds: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Claim against Defendant H

A. 1) The Plaintiff is only Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) on April 27, 2011.

A) A contract for the supply of goods was concluded with the Plaintiff, and the goods were supplied to Defendant C from that time. Defendant C, on the same day, comprehensively transferred to the Plaintiff the goods payment claim against Defendant C’s customers (hereinafter “transfer of claims”).

(2) On October 25, 2018, the Plaintiff notified Defendant C’s non-party company of the assignment of the goods amounting to KRW 23.4 million to the non-party company (hereinafter “non-party company”), and the notification reached the non-party company on October 26, 2018.

3) On November 13, 2018, the Plaintiff received a payment order against Defendant C seeking payment of KRW 1,910,124,376 of the unpaid amount of goods pursuant to the goods supply transaction agreement as of April 27, 2011, as the Suwon-si District Court Decision 2018Kadan4652 on November 13, 201, and damages for delay. (4) Defendant C received a provisional attachment order on KRW 21,432,00 among the claims against Defendant C’s non-party company, by the Daegu District Court 2018Kadan4652 on December 14, 2018. The said order was served on the non-party company on the non-party company on December 14, 2018.

5) Pursuant to the latter part of Article 487 of the Civil Act and Articles 291 and 248(1) of the Civil Execution Act, the non-party company made a mixed deposit of KRW 13,298,550 (hereinafter “instant deposit”) with the Plaintiff and the Defendant C as the principal deposit, on the grounds that the non-party company’s assignment of claims to the Plaintiff by Defendant C and the provisional seizure of claims by Defendant H cannot be known as genuine creditors (hereinafter “instant

(i) [Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings;

(b) Determination on the cause of the claim 1.