The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the court below is too inappropriate.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime even if he had a previous conviction for the same kind of crime, and the instant crime is committed repeatedly by theft of cash, etc. by the Defendant’s disguised employment at the convenience store, or by theft of goods located in the stairs, etc. of department stores over a number of times, etc., and the nature of the instant crime is not good. Considering the maximum amount of damage caused by the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.