1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: (a) the real estate listed in Appendix 2 No. 1’s real estate list; and (b) the Defendant B, the same list No. 3.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 3 of the judgment as to the claim against Defendant B, the Plaintiff (the Korea National Housing Corporation prior to the change) entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B on May 27, 201, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 16,300,00, and the lease term of KRW 190,850 from May 27, 201 to June 30, 2013 (hereinafter “the lease agreement in this case”). The Plaintiff’s delivery of the instant real estate to Defendant B, even after the said lease term expires, the lease agreement in this case was renewed from October 201 to June 30, 201, and the fact that the Plaintiff continued to occupy and terminate the lease agreement in this case from May 27, 201 to June 30, 190 to June 30, 2013; the Plaintiff’s announcement of intention that the lease agreement in this case will continue to be paid to Defendant B from June 1, 2015 and 2018.

According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B did not pay more than three vehicles, and the instant lease agreement was lawfully terminated on December 23, 2015 by serving a copy of the complaint of this case.

Furthermore, even after the termination of the instant lease agreement, the fact that Defendant B used the instant real estate is as seen earlier, and the benefit that Defendant B gains therefrom is confirmed to be the same amount as that of the instant lease agreement.

Therefore, the Plaintiff.