The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the daily worker, who lives in the same published source as the victim.

At around 20:30 on July 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting the victim’s lab by taking his laundry into the laundry machine before the Goyang-gu building B, the fifth floor Cpublic notice room, and (b) Do (the victim’s 39 years of age, south) in his laundry machine; (c) making the victim’s laundry in the laundry machine; and (d) making the victim’s laundry in the lab, making the la

2. The offense of assaulting the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act.

However, according to the statement on the withdrawal of a complaint submitted by D bound to the records, D, the victim, withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on September 23, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case.

Thus, this case is a case where the expression of intent to punish a case which cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim is withdrawn.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.