logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2016.02.18 2015가단103881
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff, Defendant B’s KRW 17,195,572, Defendant C, and D respectively, and each of the said money from June 18, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a nonprofit corporation managing the Gu building A (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) during Ansan-si, and E works as the Plaintiff’s representative from July 2001, while managing the instant commercial building, and died on June 18, 2014.

B. Meanwhile, from May 14, 2004, E owned 603 commercial buildings of this case from May 14, 2004, and upon the death of E, Defendant B (3/7), Defendant C, and D (2/7 respectively) inherited E’s property.

C. Defendant B delivered 1,989,234 won to the Plaintiff in balance of the management expense account.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, the purport of whole pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. E’s debt 1) Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to the records in the evidence Nos. 2 and 3 of the shopping district No. 603, Sep. 2006 to Jun. 2014, the fact that management expenses imposed on the shopping district No. 603 were 43,210,50, and the plaintiff received 10,584,320 among them. Thus, E is obligated to pay 32,626,180 won to the plaintiff, barring any special circumstance, unless it is otherwise alleged that E offsets management expenses with 70,000 won. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the defendants’ above assertion is without merit, and it is reasonable to acknowledge that E’s electric utility charges and water consumption charges were 1,561,666,240,400 won to the plaintiff 406,406,400 won to the extent that E. 466,406,2964,25,2064).

C. In addition, according to each of the above evidence, E is from September 2006 to June 2014.

arrow