1. The plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Ex officio, we examine the legitimacy of the appeal of this case.

According to the records, the Plaintiff filed an immediate appeal against the Defendant as the Jeonju District Court 2015Guhap582, and filed an appeal against the Plaintiff on May 19, 2016, and the judgment against the Plaintiff was rendered, and the Plaintiff did not file an appeal after being served with the original copy of the judgment; and the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the Plaintiff; and the Plaintiff filed an application for legal aid with the Jeonju District Court 2016do1025 on June 21, 2016 regarding the expenses prepaid by the parties, such as stamp in the petition of appeal, service charges, etc.; the said court dismissed the application on June 21, 2016; the Plaintiff filed an immediate appeal with the Gwangju High Court 2016do1025 on November 28, 2016; the Plaintiff received a new decision to dismiss the appeal from the said court on November 20, 2016; the Plaintiff again received an order to dismiss the said reappeal from the said court on March 17, 2017, 2016.

According to the above facts of recognition, the appeal of this case is unlawful as it does not attach stamps under the provisions of law despite the order of correction. Thus, the appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Articles 408 and 219 of the Civil Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.