The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (based on factual errors) was promised that, in borrowing KRW 20 million from the victim on August 28, 2008 and December 24, 2008, the defendant loaned money to E, "if he lends money to E, he will make a joint and several surety to be received by E, or in the existing system of operation, he will make a repayment to the first in the limit to be received by E as the first owner, as the first owner; E borrowed KRW 20,000 from the victim on August 28, 2008 and December 24, 2008, respectively, he may receive KRW 20,000 from the victim, and then receive KRW 20,000 from the victim on December 24, 2008 to the payment of KRW 20,000,000 from the previous system of operation to the victim on January 1, 209, the defendant may receive KRW 200,000 from the previous system of operation, respectively.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below is based on each of the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence as stated in the judgment below, that is, the defendant, from February 2, 2008 to around 20 million won, has been operating the fake (the end of May 2009, the end of 16 Guide, the monthly deposit amount of KRW 1.34 million, and the additional payment of KRW 200,000,000,000). E was a member of the above number fraternity No. 4 (the receipt of the fraternity on May 2008) and 12 (the anticipated to receive the fraternity on January 209) from the above number fraternity, and the defendant will organize the amount of KRW 20 million from June 2009 to the victim on August 28, 2008, and the defendant will have been a member of the victim on August 28, 2008, respectively.