1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. In Chigh schools located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the Plaintiff’s assertion, from around 2005, established a policy to select school principals among the internal teachers, and implemented an assistant principal internship system, and the three teachers (Plaintiffs, E, and F) returned to the first semester, and the assistant principal was appointed among them.

Since then, while the school principal recommendation committee had the Plaintiff appointed as the principal on September 1, 2009, the Defendant sought the president of the school foundation, a relative relative, and requested that “I will continue to serve as the principal only for two years, regardless of the four-year term of office specified in the school articles of incorporation, if I appointed as the principal of the school.” The president of the school foundation, who was the Plaintiff, was not the president of the school foundation, and the Defendant, who was to give the principal of the school for two years, ordered the Defendant to give the principal of the school only two years first.” Without being able to do so, the Plaintiff may yield the principal to the Defendant.

“Preparation of a letter of commitment,” and the Defendant also retires from the school only for two years.

“After preparing a written statement, the Defendant was appointed as Chigh School principal on September 1, 2009. However, the Defendant, who promised to retire, referred to as “if he/she graduated from the third year, only until he/she graduated from the school.” As of August 201, 201, the Plaintiff came to refer to more than six months, but the Plaintiff refused to resign after six months, and eventually retired from the school for four years.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the amount of 25,400,000 won equivalent to 1/5 of illegal income 127,351,700 out of the total amount of 1/5 of the total amount of 127,351,700, which was acquired as the principal of the school for the violation of the promise to hold office for

2. According to the evidence Nos. 2-1 and 2 of the judgment No. 2, the defendant prepared and submitted to the chairperson of the school juristic person D on May 29, 2009 a letter stating, "If he has appointed a limited term as the principal, he shall complete a two-year term (two-year short term) regardless of the term and retirement age of the principal specified in Article 43 of the Articles of Incorporation, regardless of his term of office and retirement age."