Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2018, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in front of the Han River Eup's office located in Handong-gu, Handong-gu, Handong-si, Handong-gu, Handong-si, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, while standing the motor vehicle and standing the motor vehicle. Upon receiving a report from the Defendant, the Defendant driven the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as a narrow distance.

Due to reasonable grounds, it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking in a manner that contains the whole of drinking measuring instruments three times at around 17:15, around 17:20, and around 17:30 on the same day.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused to comply with a police officer's request for a measurement of breath without any justifiable reason by refusing such request for a measurement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the liquor:

1. The ledger of measurement and use of drinking alcohol;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Among the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, among the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, the following conditions are reflected: (a) there is a possibility of dismissal in the event of being sentenced to imprisonment as an employee of the Suhyup; (b) support for minor children; (c) attempted suicide with agrochemicals three days after driving of the pertinent drinking; (d) the wife was judged to have been under the influence of alcohol; and (e) the wife was under the influence of the decision of the relevant bar cancer: (e) driving of the instant drinking again after driving of the drinking even on January 14, 2018; and (e) driving of the instant drinking again after driving of the drinking even after being under the influence of alcohol; and (e) there