Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 01:04, in Seosan City B; (b) in combination with the victim D (42) and talked with the victim that the victim was fluoring the victim’s neglect of her own, and (c) threatened the victim with a knife, which is a dangerous thing in the kitchen, and threatened the victim with a knife, and with a knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife the victim’s face and body, and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. A medical opinion, and an injury medical certificate;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by field photographs and CCTV closures;
1. Articles 258-1 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Small Quantity (the following favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel did not inflict injury by carrying a chemical part, since they did not have any chemical part toward the victim, since they had the entrance door located behind the victim, and they did not have any chemical part toward the victim.
However, the crime of special injury under Article 258-2(1) of the Criminal Act is established when carrying a dangerous object and inflicts bodily injury on a person. Here, “Carrying a dangerous object” refers to cases where a person carries a dangerous object or carries a person’s body with the intent to use it at the scene of the crime (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2017Do771, Mar. 30, 2017). Since the intent to use it at the scene of the crime is carried a dangerous object under the intention to use it at the scene of the crime, it does not require the defendant to actually use a dangerous object (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do914, Mar. 30, 2007). According to each evidence, according to each evidence, the defendant does not require the victim to drink, knee, fel, etc.