logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.12 2015고단1340
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around April 16, 2010, the Defendant was a representative director by establishing (ju) L, the purpose of which is to foster game character in Gangnam-gu Seoul K and the second floor, etc.

1. On June 30, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim M in the above office held on June 30, 2010 that "the defendant tried to purchase a game computer and charge cyber money" to the victim M. The defendant purchased a computer to have employees acquire items by allowing them to play a game, such as sludge, and may impose a lot of money for selling the items so acquired. In the event of investment in this business, 70,000 won shall be paid on the 15th day from the date of the contract, and 140,000 won shall be paid every month from the following month to the 24th day."

However, in fact, since the acquisition of the above item through the acquisition of the business was caused by a friendly outcome, it was not clear, and there was no proper understanding of the feasibility of the business or review of the profit structure, so it was not possible to pay all profits, and even if investment was made from investors, there was no business plan or ability to increase profits within a short period by utilizing the investment money, so the introduction fee up to about 10% and the profits promised to the existing investors gradually, and eventually, the new investors did not have any intent or ability to return as well as the return of the profits and the principal, as agreed to by the investors, unless the new investors rapidly increase.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and obtained 12,40,000 won from the victim as the investment money immediately.

2. On July 16, 2010, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim N made a false statement to the Victim N in the above office in the same manner as Paragraph 1, and its affiliation immediately from the Victim.

arrow