(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.26 2015가단17644

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.26 2015가단17644

청구이의

Text

1. The Defendant’s Daegu District Court Decision 2015Da1427 decided March 20, 2015 against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 20, 2015, the Defendant filed a claim for the amount of acquisition with the Daegu District Court 2015dan1427 against the deceased deceased E, the inheritee, and received a favorable judgment around March 20, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

B. The deceased E died on or around February 17, 2015, and the Plaintiffs applied for a ruling of acceptance of a qualified acceptance report with the attached inherited property list attached to the Suwon District Court on or around April 17, 2015, and the above court rendered a ruling of acceptance of a qualified acceptance report by the Plaintiffs on or around June 2, 2015.

C. On April 29, 2015, upon the Defendant’s request, this Court granted the Defendant the succeeding execution clause to the Plaintiffs regarding the Defendant’s judgment on the amount of transfer money for the Defendant’s network E.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (if there is a satisfy number, including branch numbers)

(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading

2. According to the facts of recognition of the cause of the claim, the Plaintiffs filed an application for a judgment on acceptance of a report on qualified acceptance accompanied by the list of inherited property attached thereto and received a judgment on acceptance of a qualified acceptance from the court. Barring special circumstances, the Plaintiffs are deemed to have made a qualified acceptance with respect to the inheritance obligations of E, and compulsory execution with respect to the portion exceeding the inherited property

3. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. On the grounds delineated below, the Plaintiffs should be deemed to have granted a simple acceptance of the inheritance obligation.

(1) Although the Defendant asserts that the assets of the FF FF corporation belong to the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s argument that is not related to the assets of E, is without merit, and the following is examined only to the assets of E without any need to further examine the validity of qualified acceptance of inheritance obligations.

(2) 105, 1003, Jungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, G apartment is the Plaintiff E.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2017.08.23 2016가단47156

-수원지방법원 2016.10.05 2015가단128079

-인천지방법원 2016.01.08 2015가단20116

-서울북부지방법원 2015.01.14 2014가단10844

-수원지방법원 2016.04.12 2015가단61961