Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The defendants' joint criminal conduct (joint violence) together with E, a single criminal act in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. (joint violence) on August 3, 2015, the defendants walked with the victim H, I and J in the "G" restaurant located in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, "I want to drink," while they want to speak from the victims that "I will drink, I will know that I will drink," but they want to speak, "I will drink, I will drink," while they want to walk from the victims when I want to get out of the damaged restaurant, I would like to take out the victim's face at the front of the above restaurant, when I would take out the victim's face with drinking, when I would take out the victim's face with the victim's face, I would take out the victim's face with the victim's face as drinking, I would take the victim's face with the victim's face, and I will take the victim's face to the victim's face with k and k.
As a result, the Defendants jointly committed the injury to the victim H in the form of 43 days, and assaulted the victimJ, such as the injury to the mathal mathal and mathal mathal, and the injury to the victim I in the form of 21-day therapy.
2. At around August 3, 2015, the Defendant reported the above injury case in front of the restaurant “G” at around 23:20 on August 3, 2015, the Defendant said that he was arrested as a flagrant offender of the above injury case from L, a police official belonging to the Yongsan Police Station, who listened to the circumstances of the case from the above H and witness, and that he was notified of the so-called American rule, even though he was notified of the fact, the Defendant stated that “I want to get off the Chewing flachi, Nice, I am going to go off, and I am to die.”
Accordingly, the defendant is on the job in H et al.