The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court, in light of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though there were many past records of punishment due to violent crimes, and at the same time, rendered a sentence by taking into account the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.

The appellate court, compared to the first instance court, has no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the first instance sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect the first instance sentencing judgment.

Although it is recognized that the economic situation is difficult due to the lack of health due to the support of the old who suffers from brain color and the health of the defendant's delivery disc, the above sentencing conditions have been significantly changed in the trial.

It is difficult to see it.

In addition, in light of the content and period of medical treatment, the victim's degree of injury is not less severe and the above sentencing is too unreasonable considering the comprehensive consideration of the consideration of the above sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.