1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the instant case

A. On November 28, 2016, part 1 of the fee for disclosure of information by November 28, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) 2015 and 2016 to the Defendant on November 15, 2016

1. Discovery and performance of creative administration tasks;

2. On November 28, 2016, the Defendant filed a request for disclosure of information with respect to “the visit site and purpose, performance, etc. of the resident site.” (2) On November 28, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the payment of the fee of KRW 300 (two copies of the output of the disclosed data) according to the information disclosure on November 28, 2016 on the ground that the Plaintiff’s access site and the performance of the purpose, etc. were printed out in the form of output, etc. (hereinafter “the output of the disclosed data”). The Defendant made a non-disclosure decision on November 28, 2016 on the ground that the creative administration task and the performance record, etc. were not prepared and managed in the course of performing his/her duties.

B. On November 17, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) KRW 200 of the fee for disclosure of information as of November 30, 2016; and (b) pursuant to subparagraph B Inspector-1328, Nov. 15, 2016, the Plaintiff:

1. A copy of the minutes of the Information Disclosure Council following the filing of an objection, and (b) the date and place of the meeting, and the list of members and the list of participants;

2. On November 30, 2016, the Defendant filed a request with the Plaintiff for disclosure of information on the reason or grounds for holding a hidden meeting of the Information Disclosure Council, which was held. (2) On November 30, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that “the date and time and place of holding the Information Disclosure Council, the member list of the Information Disclosure Council, and the list of the participants were printed out.” The Defendant made a non-disclosure decision on the ground that the reasons for holding the meeting minutes and concealed the minutes of the Information Disclosure Council were information not prepared and managed in the course of performing their duties. (3) On November 30, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of payment of fees of KRW 200 (a copy of the printed out of the disclosed data)

(hereinafter referred to as “instant fee for information disclosure”) the sum of KRW 300 of the fee for information disclosure as of November 28, 2016 and KRW 200 of the fee for information disclosure as of November 30, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “instant fee for information disclosure”).

C. The Plaintiff on October 21, 2016