1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment of the court of first instance under Paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The Defendants asserted that, even if the Plaintiffs were to be subject to defamation due to the report in which the Plaintiffs indicated their real names, the Defendants asserted that the Defendants’ drafting of the instant article solely for public interest and its illegality is dismissed, considering that their real names and face are disclosed to the public through the press conference, etc. and their real names were widely known through disciplinary action in 2013, and that the Plaintiffs’ act was considerably damaged not only the Rovis but also the overall trust and status of the Korean church.

B. On the basis of the determination, although the plaintiffs are the head of the church of this case, it cannot be seen as a widely known official seal, and it is difficult to view that the disciplinary action against the plaintiffs is a serious crime or a public importance or a relation with the public interest, and therefore, it cannot be deemed that the defendants are justified as it merely for the sake of public interest by reporting the contents of the disciplinary action by disclosing the plaintiffs' real names in the newspaper articles of this case as they are.

The defendants' assertion is without merit.

3. The conclusion of the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.