A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an insurance solicitor working in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and the victim E is the defendant's friendship.

1. The defendant around July 201, at the office of the defendant in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D around July 201, the defendant needs to provide insurance business funds to the victim with low insurance performance.

If a loan of KRW 10 million is lent, the insurance business shall be arranged, and it shall be repaid preferentially.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use money from the injured party due to lack of living expenses at the time, and had no intention or ability to repay the money promptly after using it as the insurance business fund was promised.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 3,500,000 from the injured party around July 25, 201, and received KRW 5,000,000 on August 22, 2011, and acquired KRW 8,500,000 in total by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant, around May 2013, operated by the victim E in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu Seoul around May 2013, shall not operate an insurance business to the victim.

Finally, the Do Governor will pay the full amount of the Do Governor's loan to the Do Governor.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use money from the injured party due to lack of living expenses at the time, and had no intention or ability to repay after using money from the insurance business fund as he promised to do so.

The Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, received money from the victim to the national bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant from the victim, and acquired money from the victim via the remittance of KRW 7,675,870 on May 3, 2013.

3. Around January 2014, the Defendant explained the victim E in a restaurant operated by Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, for savings insurance to the victim, and explained the victim’s savings insurance, and “the raising of per’s old age funds and the increase of the insurance performance. The Defendant would be entitled to regularly subscribe to pension, variable amount, savings, and cancer insurance.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant lacks living expenses at the time.