logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.30 2014나8332
사생활침해명예훼손
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The plaintiff, as a Vietnam War soldier, designated his husband as a person of distinguished service to the State due to defoliants, and received veterans' benefits from the State. The defendant asserted that C Co., Ltd. operated by the defendant had been receiving medical expenses from D due to the plaintiff's husband's work in D while the plaintiff's husband worked in D, and caused damage to the plaintiff's privacy and honor by false broadcasting. Thus, the defendant is obliged to pay the plaintiff KRW 20,000,000 as compensation for damages.

It is not sufficient to acknowledge that C corporation broadcast as above with the descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 and 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow