logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.10.15 2014구합1660
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On May 27, 1987, the Plaintiff became a member of Hyundai Automobile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Nonindicted Company”) and has been engaged in the business of providing cold and hot water in the third part of Ulsan Factory located in Ulsan Factory.

On July 2, 2013, the Plaintiff attended the Non-Party Company’s “2013 Organization Revitalization Education” and became a member of the Council while receiving education.

On July 3, 2013, 2013, she was diagnosed as “the 4-5 plenary signboard escape certificate and the luxal base (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”)” by the pertinent hospital, which was admitted to the Ulsan National University Hospital.

The Plaintiff applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant regarding the instant injury and disease, but the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits on November 15, 2013 on the ground that the causal link between the instant injury and disease is not recognized.

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

(2) On May 27, 1987, the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee, but was dismissed in March 2014. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff asserted the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as a whole, and conducted an operation to impose an burden on the drilling for more than 26 years, while conducting an operation to replace hot water. In particular, the instant injury and disease constitutes occupational accidents with proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s work, but the instant disposition should be revoked unlawfully on different premise. The period of service and the type of work were employed for the non-party company on March 27, 2013, the Plaintiff continued to engage in an operation to provide a short-term operation between cold and hot water conditioning for more than 10 weeks (0:0-10-20-30-10-10-30-10-10-30-20-30-10-10-20-30-10-10-200-day work.

The plaintiff's specific contents of work.

arrow