A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of Corporation D.

The defendant and the above defendant E have taken advantage of the fact that Co., Ltd. D is a company in F's F's country as a shareholder, with the intention to obtain money from investors as if they guarantee high-amount profits within a short period of time.

On June 6, 201, E recommended the victim C to make an investment by "50% of the investment amount if the investment is made in D Co., Ltd." after introducing the law school of G University in the UK, he is operating a yacht business and golf business after graduating the law school of G, doing work with government agencies and descendants on the international financing side, and introducing false information about all funds and stocks in parallel with the national business with the capital of several hundred billion won."

On June 9, 201, the Defendant and E, at the second floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-dong 1712-5, concluded a false statement with the victim at the law office in the law office in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, that “The company is established by 200,000 voluntary retirement holders, and approximately KRW 5,130,000,000,000 is deposited in the corporate passbook, and the company has developed red bonds type technology and received an investment of KRW 20,000,000 from investors. When investing KRW 100,000,000,000 is guaranteed 50,000,000 won, and the principal and the profits will be repaid until September 30, 20

However, D Co., Ltd. was fully locked in its capital, and did not attract investments of 20 billion won from investors, and it was in need of supplementation because it was technically insufficient and necessary to supplement the red type security system project that was promoted by E. The advertising business using the public telephone room, which was promoted by the Defendant, did not complete the production of sampling, and thus, even if receiving investments from the victims, there was no intent or ability to repay the principal and the profits within a short time by promoting the above business.

The defendant and E shall be the same day from the victim.