Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. No one shall arrange the sale and purchase of a motor vehicle after being requested by a person other than its owner entered in the original register of Defendant A;

Nevertheless, on March 9, 2013, the Defendant arranged F to sell the said vehicle to B, not the owner on the register of a newter vehicle, in the D Motor Vehicle Trading Company in Busan, located in the Busan metropolitan area.

2. Defendant B

(a) A person who acquires an automobile which is registered not to perform the ownership transfer registration after the acquisition of the automobile, shall apply for the registration of ownership transfer to the competent authority within 15 days;

On March 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) taken over a newter vehicle from F from F to F in the D Motor Vehicle Trading Company located in the Busan metropolitan area; and (b) did not file an application for ownership transfer registration in the name of the Defendant within 15 days.

(b) Where a transferee of an unregistered motor vehicle intends to re-transfer it to a third party, the ownership transfer registration shall be made in his/her name before transferring it;

The defendant above A.

In spite of the acquisition by transfer of E New Airport vehicle from F from F as described in the paragraph, the said vehicle was transferred to “G” without compensation to a person who is unable to identify the sex in the vicinity of the Seodaemun-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do at the end of August 2013.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of F and H:

1. Each investigation report, Defendant A, who notified the place of business violating the Automobile Management Act, asserts that the sale and purchase of the instant Poter vehicle was personally F and B, and the Defendant did not offer good offices for the sale. However, according to the above evidence, such as the witness B’s statement in the court, F’s statement in the police, and the car sales contract (in pages 58), the Defendant kept the said Poter vehicle in his/her possession.