logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.09.21 2012고단712
위계공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on September 21, 2004, at the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for six months as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by fraudulent means, and the judgment was finalized on October 1, 2004.

[2012 Highest 712] Defendant A is a “brok” called “Brok” for mediating the transfer and acquisition of a private taxi transport business. Defendant B is a person who obtained a private taxi transport business license in the Hanam-si around November 2009 and transferred to D on February 11, 201, and E is a person who performs a business of repairing a taximeter and selling a private taxi in the trade name of “F”.

Within five years from the date of obtaining a license for private taxi transport business under the Passenger Transport Service Act, a person who has obtained a license for private taxi transport business under the said Act shall not transfer his/her business unless he/she is unable to drive himself/herself due to disease for which treatment should be provided for more than one year. However, in the event that a person who has obtained a license for private taxi transport business applies for a license for private taxi transport business and submits a diagnosis report with documents proving the reason for transfer, an administrative agency without medical knowledge or experience may not take a measure for authorization based on the doctor’s diagnosis or opinion. Based on the fact that the person who obtained a license for private taxi transport business cannot drive due to disease requiring long-term medical treatment, the Defendants and E were willing to unlawfully obtain a license for private taxi transport business by issuing

Defendant

B On December 2010, 2010, Ha requested Ha to transfer his own taxi transport business using a false diagnosis certificate to Ha, and Ha to introduce Defendant B to Ha to create a false diagnosis certificate on Defendant B, and Defendant A cannot identify the name at the Incheon I Hospital through H, subject to commission to KRW 12 million.

arrow