A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2013, 2013, the fraud Defendant: (a) around March 2013, 2013, from C to the victim D, “after cultivating a 60 million Korean Won on the face of the State, he/she would deliver the entire part of the worship cultivated on August 2013 to C.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have sufficient funds necessary for the deaf company, such as land rent, fertilizer value, and distribution weather value. Ultimately, even if the Defendant received the payment from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to supply drilling to the injured party.

The Defendant, on January 10, 2013, sustained KRW 20 million from the injured party, and the same year.

4. 8. Minority KRW 20 million, and the same year.

5. Around 13. Around 20 million won was delivered to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.

2. Around March 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the “F” shop operated by the Defendant located in Thai City E on March 2014, 2014; (b) the Defendant, despite having received the payment as described in paragraph (1), would give rise to the Defendant’s defect; (c) the Defendant, “50 million won,” cultivated the Defendant, and then handed over the entire amount of the charge after cultivating the Defendant.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was in a situation where it is difficult for the Defendant to cultivate a worship equivalent to KRW 10 million, and eventually, even if the Defendant received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to supply the worship to the victim.

The Defendant, from the victim on March 5, 2014, KRW 20 million around March 5, 2014, and the same year.

4. The same year, around 29.20 million won, around 29.2 million won.

5. Around 29.20 million won was delivered to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A complaint, a certificate of confirmation of deposit, a letter of payment, a written contract for lump sum transactions, a certificate of deposit confirmation, a written statement, or a statement;

1. A written appeal;

1. A fact-finding certificate;

1. A copy of a report on investigation (attached details of accounts used by a suspect), and a statement of each deposit transaction;

1. Investigation report (to hear G telephone statements from policyholders, 2013, and comparative reporting of suspect statements from suspects);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (the existence of a suspect's deception and intent to repay);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;