1. The instant lawsuit was concluded upon the final and conclusive decision of this Court to recommend reconciliation on March 4, 2014.

2...

1. The following facts on the premise of fact are apparent in the record or significant to this Court:

On March 4, 2014, this Court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation for the fair resolution of the instant case, and served the original copy of the said ruling to the Plaintiffs on March 5, 2014, respectively, and served to the Defendants other than Defendant G on March 7, 2014, and served the Defendant G on March 13, 2014.

B. On March 6, 2014, the Plaintiffs raised an objection to the said decision of recommending reconciliation, but withdrawn it on March 10, 2014. The withdrawal was sent to the remaining Defendants other than Defendant G on March 14, 2014, and was sent to Defendant G on March 20, 2014, respectively.

C. On March 10, 2014, the Plaintiffs submitted a new written objection regarding the decision of recommending reconciliation on the same day after the receipt of the written withdrawal of the objection.

2. Determination

A. A party who has filed an objection against a ruling of recommending reconciliation ex officio may withdraw an objection with the consent of the other party until a judgment is rendered at that instance (Article 228(1) of the Civil Procedure Act). If the other party does not raise an objection within two weeks from the date on which a written withdrawal was served on the other party (Articles 228(2) and 266(6) of the Civil Procedure Act), the other party shall be deemed to have consented to the withdrawal of the objection (Articles 228(2) and 266(6) of the Civil Procedure Act).

B. As to the instant case, on March 6, 2014, the Plaintiffs withdrawn the foregoing objection on March 10, 2014 after raising an objection, and the written withdrawal of the objection was served on March 14, 2014 with respect to the remaining Defendants except Defendant G, and on March 20, 2014 with respect to Defendant G, it was served on or ordered to serve each of the Defendants on March 20, 2014, and the Defendants did not raise an objection within two weeks thereafter, the said written recommendation of compromise was deemed to have never been filed from the beginning, and was finalized on March 27, 2014, which was the expiration date of the filing period.

C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiffs raised the objection.