1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment of the plaintiff as to the argument at the appellate court as stated in the following subparagraphs. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2)

2. The plaintiff's argument on the plaintiff's assertion argues that since he joined the National Pension Plan around 1997 and paid the pension premium for more than 10 years until February 2008, the plaintiff was entitled to a reduced old age pension under Article 62 (2) of the National Pension Act on June 28, 2009, and therefore, the defendant was entitled to a reduced old age pension under Article 62 (2) of the National Pension Act, and therefore, the defendant was paid the plaintiff a reduced old age pension after changing the special old age pension to the reduced old

However, each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 6 through 11 (including paper numbers) is insufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiff joined the National Pension Service in around 1997, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion based on a different premise is not acceptable.

(Other arguments in the appellate court are only independent opinion and cannot be accepted).

3. The decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.