logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.09.15 2017고정58
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 6,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: (a) had a foreign woman who is not qualified for massage, employed a F and massage clinic; (b) had the foreign woman who is not qualified for massage; (c) had the Defendant established a “G” under the name of Defendant A; (d) had the Defendant B and the Defendant C as an employee in charge of the business of providing customer guidance, etc.; (c) had the Defendant B and the Defendant C as an employee in charge of the business of operating the “G” and the overall business; and (d) Defendant A had the business operator lent the name of the business operator; and (d) had the business operator regularly received monthly revenues from F, and had the business-related situation

(a) No person who violates the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, including brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (hereinafter referred to as "sexual traffic"), shall arrange sexual intercourse (hereinafter referred to as "sexual traffic"), in return for giving, receiving, or promising to give, money, valuables, and other property benefits to unspecified persons;

Nevertheless, on December 20, 2016, Defendant A conspired with F and arranged to engage in sexual traffic with unspecified male customers who find the above business place by employing in 'G' as female employees who are in charge of sexual traffic in Thailand nationality I and J in H at around December 2016.

As a result, Defendant A, in collusion with F, employed female workers with foreign nationality from August 10, 2014 to the above day, by engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic in collusion with F.

(b) No person violating the Immigration Control Act shall employ any person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, on December 20, 2016, Defendant A, in collusion with F, employed Defendant A as a female employee in charge of sexual traffic, who is a female employee in the Thailand, who is a national of Thailand, who does not have the status of stay to work in the Republic of Korea after entering into the country or other tourism visa, and who is a female employee in charge of sexual traffic.

(c)

. Violation of the Medical Service Act

arrow