1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,966,128 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from March 29, 2015 to October 6, 2015.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence of 1 to 3 and Eul evidence of 1 to 4, unless there is a dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings:

C The remittance amount as of December 21, 201, 200 on December 21, 201, 200, 2003, 500 on March 4, 2012, 204, 500 on March 4, 2012, 50 on March 30, 201, 60 on April 3, 2012, 7,240,000 on April 60, 206, 207, 207, 240 C transferred to the Defendant’s account as follows:

B. On January 12, 2012, 12, 1,000 11, 200 11, 2013, 202, the Defendant’s total remittance Nos. 150, 203, 50 on June 25, 2013, 2013, 6. 4. 6. 16. 50, 2014. 15. 20, 2015, 206. 16. 5. 20, 205, 2014. 5. 25, 205, 2014. 5. 20, 2015:

C. Inheritance C died on November 2014, and as a bereaved family member, there is the Plaintiff, who is the husband of the deceased, as the father of the deceased.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff alleged by the parties as above 1.A.

As seen in the above, the Defendant asserts that the money transferred by the deceased to the Defendant is a loan, and that it is a donation that is given or received from the deceased’s relationship with the deceased before the deceased’s birth.

B. According to the statements or images of the evidence Nos. 7 through 9, it is recognized that the deceased had a relationship with the defendant, but on the other hand, it appears that the amount of money exchanged between the deceased and the defendant goes beyond the degree of each subparagraph, and that the deceased still remains money to be paid from the defendant.