logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015.09.10 2013다214802
부당이득금
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay the refund to the Plaintiff was not due, on the grounds that the effect of the instant resolution at the time of completion of the project, which set the time of refund, has already ceased to be a union member and does not affect the Plaintiff, who

The judgment below

In light of the records, although the court below's reasoning is somewhat inappropriate, the above conclusion of the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of inconsistency in the grounds or by misapprehending the interpretation and validity of Article 12 (4) of the Code of this case and the legal principles on the validity of the resolution of this case, which affected the conclusion

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow