(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2016.11.03 2016가단100856

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2016.11.03 2016가단100856

용역비

Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 20,640,000 won and interest, which shall be from February 3, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 7, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for design and supervision as KRW 22,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) with respect to the storage and guard room among the Defendant’s factory expansion works in Asan-si (hereinafter “instant construction works”).

B. After that, the Plaintiff determined the design change cost of KRW 6,00,000 on January 15, 2014 (excluding value-added tax) for the instant construction as KRW 7,8 warehouse construction among the instant construction, and entered into a design supervision agreement for the instant construction as to the design and supervision cost of KRW 10,50,000 on the same day (excluding value-added tax) and the design cost of the instant construction as KRW 1,50,000 on the same day (excluding value-added tax).

C. The plaintiff is the above A.

paragraphs 1 and 2.

Upon completion of each design service described in the port, the design map was supplied, and the extended factory designed by the Plaintiff was approved on July 3, 2014.

Meanwhile, among the above design and supervision costs, the Plaintiff was paid KRW 7,260,000 on November 14, 2013, and KRW 5,000 on December 18, 2013, and KRW 7,100,000 on January 13, 2014, and KRW 23,360,000 on June 24, 2014 (i.e., KRW 7,260,000 on KRW 5,00,000 on June 24, 2014) by the Defendant.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 6, tax information and replys of this court on the Asansan affairs, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the service cost of KRW 44,00,000 (including KRW 24,200,000, KRW 600,000, KRW 11,550,000, KRW 165,000, and value-added tax) less KRW 23,360,00, which the plaintiff was paid for, and delay damages for, the service cost of each of the design and supervision contracts of this case (including KRW 44,00,000) and the amount of KRW 23,360,00,000, which the plaintiff was paid.

3. If so, the defendant seeks to pay KRW 20,640,000 to the plaintiff and the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.10.11 2017가단60717

-의정부지방법원 2017.03.30 2016가단35420

-대전지방법원천안지원 2020.10.14 2020가단106790

-수원지방법원 2015.04.30 2014가합1976

-서울북부지방법원 2016.01.12 2015가단14119