The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although there was a misunderstanding of facts that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, the Defendant did not have any fact that the victim’s head was frighted and frighted on the floor as stated in the facts charged of this case.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the court below legitimately adopted and examined the following circumstances: ① At the time of the instant case, F witnessed the scene of assault by means of lowering the victim’s head, citing the victim’s head, which was used on the floor at the time of the instant case, from investigative agency to court of the court below, stated that “F, at the time of the instant case, determined that male who flicks with the victim’s head, who flicks and flicks with the victim’s head, flicks about 3 to 4 times the victim’s head, and flicks with the victim’s head.” ② The F’s statement is consistent and concrete, and is a person without any relationship with the defendant and the victim, and thus, it can be recognized that Flicks and flicks were used in the instant case’s body at the time of the instant case, and the victim’s photograph, diagnosis document, etc., the victim and flicks were found to have suffered injury to the victim’s head and fl.