The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the event of a mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, the Defendant did not have exercised the physical force first, but did not have used the physical force first, and the Defendant was found guilty of the facts charged in the instant case by misunderstanding of facts or misapprehending legal principles, despite the fact that the Defendant was merely able to collect the head of the victim’s face in a narrow elevator because the victim was able to have the face of the Defendant and carried the head debt.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 300,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The defendant's assertion of mistake or misapprehension of legal principles is identical to the grounds for appeal for mistake of facts in the original court, and the court below rejected the above assertion by clearly explaining the defendant's assertion and its decision in detail under the title "a judgment on the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion". In light of the evidence and records duly adopted and examined by the original court and the appellate court, the judgment of the court below is just, and therefore, the defendant's allegation of mistake or misapprehension of legal principles is

B. Comprehensive review of various circumstances, including the fact that the Defendant did not object to his mistake and denies the instant crime; that the Defendant was punished for violent crimes; that the lower court already imposed a fine more reduced than the fine amount (500,000 won) of the summary order by taking account of the favorable circumstances for the Defendant; that there was no change in circumstances or circumstances that may newly be considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment; and that there was no change in the age, character, environment, etc. of the Defendant’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s sentence appears to be appropriate; thus, the Defendant’s allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.