A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, at around 10:00 on November 30, 2018, was driving a D bargaining car in accordance with one lane among the two-lanes in the Cmiddle School in the direction of the Gangwon-do, the Defendant: (a) did not turn on the direction, etc.; (b) did not turn on the Defendant’s vehicle in the future; (c) was driven by the Defendant’s vehicle; and (d) was driven by the Defendant’s vehicle, which is a dangerous object, driven the frighting car; and (d) stopped the frighting car; (d) the victim continued to drive the frighting car; and (e) the victim continued to drive the frighting car; and (e) the victim’s vehicle going into two-lanes.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving) are those who are engaged in driving of D bargaining automobiles.

On November 30, 2018, at around 10:00, the Defendant driven the said vehicle in a condition that it is difficult to drive normally due to the influence of alcohol by 0.127%, and led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle on the sloping bridge at the direction of the police box, at the time of the Gangwon-do 136-21, the 136-21 upper knife.

At the same time, retaining walls are installed in the vicinity, and there are vehicles driving in the next lane, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle, such as taking the front side and the left side, changing the vehicle line, etc.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving at retaliation as described in the above paragraph 1, and the retaining wall installed on the road was shocked in the future of the above FF driver’s vehicle due to its negligence, and was shocked into the upper right part of the FF driver’s vehicle in front of the upper right part of the FF driver’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant is a victim G who was present in the above-mentioned car due to occupational negligence.