Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 04:00 on November 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) went to the front door of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Ftel, Seoul, the Defendant’s residence, by drinking alcohol at a cafeteria located in the new police station in Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) on behalf of the Defendant; (c) on behalf of the Defendant, the Defendant went to the front door of the vehicle of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, which is the Defendant’s residence; (d) on the ground that the foregoing D was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant reported to 112; and (e) the police station G police box in Seoul, the police station in Suwon-gu,

At around 04:10 on November 3, 2017, the Defendant shouldered the Defendant who was divingd in the front of the instant “F” officetel in front of the instant officetel, and on the ground that: (a) the Defendant was satisfed by the Defendant “F” in the front of the instant officetel; and (b) the Defendant was satisfed.

Whether our father is a person or not;

“A police officer who flafs the knife knife knife knife, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of his duties concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to I and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the upper part of the body;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is that the contents or nature of the crime in this case is not exceptionally and thus, the corresponding punishment is needed.

On the other hand, considering favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all the crimes, reflects the mistake, did not have the same criminal record, resulting in contingent crimes, and that the defendant also suffered from the framework of the offline plelar in the course of committing the crimes.

Other factors of sentencing recorded in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, the same sentence as the order shall be determined.