A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for fraud in Busan District Court's Dong Branch Branch, which was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on June 28, 2018.

The Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim wanted to appoint a professor of C University from his/her father with his/her father in the victim B and singing classes, and tried to acquire money from the victim by deceiving the victim as professor of C University.

1. On June 12, 2018, around June 12, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around June 12, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “I would like to find inside the country at the office of the head of Sinnndo and Cr. Dr. I would like to request a professor’s position for a minor gift. I would like to commit fraud at KRW 1 million.”

However, the defendant did not know the person at a position to exercise influence over the appointment of professors of the above university, and he thought that he would use the money received from the victim for personal purposes, so even if he received money as a gift for the purchase of gift necessary for the appointment of professors, he did not have the intention or ability to appoint his father/child to the above university.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 1 million won from the E-bank account in the name of the Defendant for the purchase of gift necessary for teaching appointment from the victim, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On June 14, 2018, around June 14, 2018, the defrauded made a false statement that “Around June 14, 2018, the Defendant: “Around June 2018, the defrauded should prepare for cash preparation for the appointment of a professor of the Crified President and divide KRW 100 million to the professors of schools.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim as a visa for the appointment of professor, he thought that he will use it as the agreed amount of his fraud case which was under trial at the time.