logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2020.08.18 2018가단34137
토지인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the area of 330 square meters prior to Jinju-si, the attached appraisal marks 9, 10, 11, 5, 6, 12, and 9 shall apply.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The previous 330 square meters prior to Jinju-si (hereinafter “instant land”) reached the present time through division and merger as follows. The said land becomes a part of B B’s 284 square meters prior to Jinju-si, Seoul-si, on the basis of the 455 square meters prior to the merger.

(A) B prior to the merger on May 29, 2017, 2017, 200 m220 m25 m20 m20 m220 m20 m20 m20 m20 m20 m20 m20 m220 m20 m20 m20 m20 m20 m220 m20 m220 m220 m220 m20 m202

B. On May 30, 2017, G Co., Ltd.: (a) on May 30, 2017, 330/739 square meters, shares were sold to the Plaintiff; and (b) half of the remaining shares were sold to H and I; and (c) the Plaintiff, H and I completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 2, 2017.

On July 4, 2017, the previous B was divided into the instant land and 409 square meters on July 4, 2017. On July 14, 2017, the instant land was owned solely by the Plaintiff, and each ownership transfer registration was completed with H and I’s 409 square meters on the ground of the partition of co-owned property on July 14, 2017.

C. Meanwhile, among the instant land, the land of this case is used as a road which combines six-distance intersections and K-road 2,063 square meters on the 4,51 square meters in order to connect each point of the attached Table 9,10,11,5,6,12, and9 (hereinafter “instant road”) with the land of this case, which are packed as asphalt and packed as the asphalt, and is used as a road which combines six-distance intersections and K-road 2,063 square meters.

【Ground of recognition】 In the absence of dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, 5, Eul Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, each entry (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. In full view of Gap evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 9, and 10 or images, L witnesses, M’ testimony from the Jinju market, fact-finding inquiry results, and the entire purport of oral argument with respect to the removal of asphalt and the request for extradition, ① the land whose original N was owned before E prior to the annexation of the land of this case, and N was deceased on April 22, 1961.

arrow