beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff, Defendant C, and Defendant D invested one-third of each share in money and jointly purchased each real estate listed in the separate sheet from E. (2) Defendant B, the wife of the Plaintiff, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant C, and Defendant C, was agreed on September 4, 2015 to register the ownership of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3 in the name of F, and to register the ownership of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and the separate sheet No. 2 in the name of Defendant B, upon the request of the Plaintiff, Defendant C, and Defendant D, to register the ownership of each share.
3) On October 23, 2015, the Plaintiff, Defendant C, and Defendant D agreed to register the ownership transfer under the name of the Plaintiff for convenience with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet 3 attached hereto, and to register the ownership transfer corresponding to each share at the request of Defendant C and Defendant D or when necessary. (4) Accordingly, upon delivery of a copy of the instant complaint, the Plaintiff seeks implementation of the procedures for the registration of the transfer of ownership on September 4, 2015 with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2 by serving the Plaintiff as a copy of the instant complaint, and seek implementation of the procedures for the registration of the transfer of ownership on October 23, 2015, when each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet 3 is divided into one-third shares among the real estate listed in the separate sheet 3.
B. Determination is not sufficient to acknowledge the existence of the agreement on September 4, 2015 and October 23, 2015, as alleged by the Plaintiff, solely on the basis of the following facts: (a) Party A’s 1 through 8, Party A’s 9-1 through 6, Party A’s 10-13, and Defendant D’s examination result; and (b) there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit.
2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.