Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From January 20, 2012 to March 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to the Seoul Southern District Court (the Seoul Southern District Court 2014Da3409 Decided October 5, 2015) to undertake the construction of a new multi-household (C) construction project, which is located in the Gyeonggi-si city of Gyeonggi-do, and to request the representative director E to pay the construction cost of KRW 12,19,000, and to pay the construction cost of KRW 12,199,00.
Accordingly, the Defendant, at the Seoul Southern District Court on January 28, 2016, delegated the construction of multi-family house F with the owner F who is not related to the instant case to the Defendant and receive the construction cost of KRW 30,680,000 to the Defendant on February 23, 2012, and received it by the Defendant, and the reason for delegation was the Defendant’s direct employment of the Plaintiff as a “general manager at the site” and delegated the receipt under the pretext of payment.
“The Plaintiff’s claim was dismissed, and submitted a false statement of grounds for appeal, and on April 8, 2016, the District Court of the Dong-gu, the Government City of Dong-si, the Government City of Dong-si, the Defendant was working as the site site for the sewage pipe newly built in D, the Defendant Company, from February 23, 2012 to around one year.
The defendant received part of the construction cost that the defendant did not receive from the owner (F) on behalf of the owner of the building on behalf of the owner of the building who did not pay to the plaintiff, agreed to do so instead of the payment, and prepared the power of attorney to the plaintiff.
In doing so, I will request the payment of the above agreed amount upon confirmation that the above owner had already paid the construction cost of KRW 30,680,000 to the defendant.
“The claim for false contract amount (2016 Ghana 11073) was filed to the effect that it is “.”
However, fact was that E requested the payment of construction cost to the defendant who is in close relation with the owner, that the defendant did not work as the site manager of D operated by E, that E agreed to pay two million won per month to the defendant, or that E agreed to pay two million won per month from the owner.