Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 18:30 on March 13, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim C(the age of 65) about 4-5 times in the face face of the victim while taking a bath on the ground that the victim C (the age of 65) goes beyond the Defendant's essay as a Trackter, and continued to scam the victim's scam, and inflicted an injury on the victim for about 28 days in need of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. C’s legal statement;
1. Photographss, etc. of damaged parts of the victim C;
1. Medical records;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a certified copy of medical records (E University Hospital) and a certificate of injury (C);
1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense, since the victim was satisfe of the defendant in the first place, and the victim's satisf was omitted in the process of taking them away.
The following circumstances revealed from the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., ① the victim has consistently testified and testified that the defendant's fingers did not go against the defendant's fingers and that the defendant's face was faced with the defendant's drinking, ② the victim's face photograph taken by the police officer on the day of the instant case shows that the victim's fingers are under the influence of long-standing drinking, in addition to the victim's objection, such circumstance does not appear to have occurred in the process of reducing the victim's fingers, and it corresponds to the victim's statement and testimony that the defendant's drinkings of the defendant, ③ the defendant was the F Council member on the date and place of the first hospital treatment, but the defendant was the G Hospital's investigative agency.