logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.02.04 2015고단2560
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the victim C's blind village and the person who frienda, and the two people are the victim's friend during the process of hedging with the victim's d's obsing and slandering the cause, etc., which led to the victim's obsing.

1. No person who violates the Act on the Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. shall allow any person to reach another person repeatedly in the form of code, text, sound, image, or picture creating fear or apprehension through an information and communications network;

On December 14, 2014, the Defendant sent to the Defendant’s residence located in Seongbuk-si, Sungnam-si to the Defendant’s account of the Kakao Scaro Sao Sama, using the Kakao Satoo Sato that is operated by Kakao Co., Ltd., to the Defendant’s “Yacheon-si expected for a astronomical life,” and “Yakao Sao Sato that Kao Sa to be a lifelong life,” and then, from that to June 11, 2015, the Defendant repeatedly used the Defendant’s domicile in the same manner 91 times in total, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Around January 5, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) (Defamation) posted a photograph to cut down a text message sent to the Defendant by the victim-friendly D, who had opened a Kakao Stockholm group hosting room at the place of residence of the above Defendant; opened a Kakao Stockholm; opened a Kakao Stockholm group hosting at the place of residence; and published a photograph to cut down the text message sent to the Defendant by the victim-friendly D; and then, opened the message to the public when “non-human is false and false for several years

A notice posted a text message stating that “If a person continues to continue without any reflect, data would be so known and that it would begin to act,” and “C” was published as if the victimized person sent a text message that slanders the Defendant.

In this respect.

arrow