logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.06.08 2018고단137
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

(a) acquired;

2. On January 18, 2018, at around 03:50, the Defendant: (a) taken a victim’s taxi on the front of the 51-day Dop Dop Dop Dop 51; and (b) taken a large amount of taxi charges, such as the foregoing paragraph 1, on the road in front of the Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Do; (c) brought the victim’s bridge on the Dop Dop Dop Dop Gun on one occasion; and (d) continued to put the victim’s bridge on the victim’s bridge to undergo approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim.

[2018 Highest 274] The defendant is a friendly child of the victim L(n, 46 years of age).

On January 7, 2018, the Defendant, at the first floor parking lot of NNA, the residence of the victim in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget-gun M around 17:0, the Defendant, on the ground that his father’s father was drinking and driving, she left the Internet-learning car, which is the victim’s possession, with the goods dangerous to the front, front and rear glass, and damaged the above NA 5*** by getting off the front door automatically, the front door, and the front and rear glass.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and damaged the victim's property.

[2018 Highest 288] On January 23, 2018, the Defendant ordered food as if the Defendant would normally pay food to the victims in the “R cafeteria P” of the victim Q in the Chungcheongnam-gun P of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do around 18:15.

However, since the defendant did not have sufficient money at the time, there was no intention or ability to pay food costs even if he received food from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and did not pay the amount equivalent to the above amount of 118,000 won in total from the injured party. The defendant was provided with 1,18,000 won in light of the light blade (China), 1, 2, 2, and 2.

In this respect, the defendant had taken advantage of property benefits by deceiving the victim.

arrow