A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendant is 14 persons who install a CCTV and shower room to avoid crackdowns, and operate a “Cama Mamast”.

On December 13, 2013, around 22:30, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts for the business from the beginning of December 2, 2013 to January 22, 2014, by having sexual traffic women E and F receive KRW 1.30,00,00 for commercial sex acts at the above “C Ansan Mar Marma Place” located on the members D and 8th of Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor and police suspect interrogation protocol regarding I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Voluntary report and each internal investigation report;

1. Written statements of E and F, and written statements of J;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of sentencing)

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act is a case where the defendant mediates sexual traffic for business purposes, and the defendant has the record of punishing the same criminal acts, and further commits the same criminal acts while being investigated as the crime of this case, it is unfavorable under the circumstances where the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the defendant is in depth against his mistake by recognizing all of the crimes of this case, and the defendant has no specific penalty power except once a fine is imposed, and the above place is currently used as a lease office rather than a place of business, and all of the sentencing conditions in the trial of this case shall be determined as ordered by the order.