The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered is too unreasonable to impose a fine of 500,000 won.

2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant reflects his mistake; and (c) the Defendant is economically difficult circumstances; (b) the lower court appears to have sentenced to punishment by reducing the amount of fine for the summary order by taking account of the above circumstances of the Defendant; (c) there are no special changes in circumstances to change the sentence of the lower court; (d) the Defendant did not agree with the victim or endeavor to recover from damage; (c) the Defendant was prior to and five times of suspended sentence; and (d) other circumstances indicated in the Defendant’s records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, even if considering the Defendant’s assertion, the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed to be unfair because it

(However, it is clear that the “hume” of the two pages 1-2 of the lower judgment is a clerical error in the “humping and walking,” and thus, it is decided to revise ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure. 3. Therefore, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.